Torn Up and Burned Bodies Lie in Grass After Crash of Malaysian Boeing 777 in Ukraine

A nighttime video from the crash site of Boeing 777, filmed by Eastern Ukrainian TV channel Lugansk 24, shows torn up and burned bodies of Flight MH-17 victims scattered across a field of tall grass. Some victims are entangled in their seats, others lay motionlessly alone as flies frolic on their corpses.

Lugansk is where the Ukrainian unelected puppet government has air-bombed dozens of civilians over the past few weeks. Indeed, even the announcer of this segment, which is titled “Without Commentary” because the content of the segment is only briefly introduced so viewers know what this is about, but the images themselves are played back without accompanying spoken word, so viewer can form their own thoughts, says it appears that the plane had been shot down by the Kiev government.

Because the mainstream media have clearly been tasked to sell to the public the idea that the plane was shot down by pro Russia separatists with a Russia supplied BUK-M anti aircraft radar guided missile, I’m guessing you have all heard of the audio of phone conversations between a Russian army general and pro Russian separatists that the Ukrainian authorities allegedly picked up and published on YouTube as “proof” that flight MH17 was shot down by separatists.

Below is a video that appears to debunk the “proof” as fake. Basically, it says that the “proof” video was created before the crash took place, published within a short time frame after the crash, and then quickly removed after the uploader realized the meta data of the file could be accessed.

MSM went into a similar frenzy a year ago when their mission was to sell the Syrian gas attack to the public. It’s funny to notice how right now everything is about blaming Russia, but you’d have to dig really hard in order to find reports about the little fact that NATO had battle ready squadrons in full gear in the Black Sea where they just “successfully concluded” their war games.

Two days before the MH17 crash, the Ukrainian authorities pointed fingers at Russia because one of their fighter jets, which was flying at 6.5 km altitude, was shot down over Eastern Ukraine. Kiev said it had to be Russians because the separatists only had shoulder mounted manpads and those can’t shoot down aircraft flying at 20,000 feet.

Even pro bullshit CNN discussed the logistics of the Ukrainian separatists having the capability to shoot down the plane and concluded that it’s very unlikely that the rebels could have shot it down:

What seems unlikely is that pro-Russia separatists might have gained control of such a sophisticated piece of weaponry and used it to shoot down an airliner, Ryan said. “It takes a lot of training and a lot of coordination to fire one of these and hit something,” he said. Typically, a surface-to-air battery missile consists of a command post vehicle, a radar vehicle, several self-propelled launchers, loader vehicles and even more vehicles to carry new missiles to the batteries as necessary, according to Dan Wasserbly, Americas editor for IHS Jane’s. Ryan concludes then that if the plane really was shot down, a professional military force – either on purpose or by accident – was responsible. “This is not the kind of weapon a couple of guys are going to pull out of a garage and fire,” he said.

In conclusion – a radar installation is necessary to hit a plane flying at 550 mph at 33,000 feet up, because the BUK onboard radar doesn’t have enough range. The separatists did not have a radar system that could be linked to a BUK anti-aircraft missile launcher. The only radar in Eastern Ukraine that could guide a BUK missile is controlled by Kiev.